Bug 830013
| Summary: | Review Request: flowblade - Non-linear video editor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adrian Alves <aalves> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | aalves, hobbes1069, ismael, lemenkov, mrunge, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-03-12 09:35:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Adrian Alves
2012-06-08 02:04:36 UTC
"Requires: ffmpeg" This won't be allowed. Requires: frei0r This doesn't exist in fedora, what is this, where is that from? (In reply to comment #1) > "Requires: ffmpeg" > > This won't be allowed. Fixed and tested with rpmlint Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/flowblade-0.6.0-2.fc16.src.rpm While I'd like to see this in Fedora, most video editors are in RPM Fusion.
I maintain Openshot and co-maintain Kdenlive. I actually packaged Flowblade as well before I searched for it and found this review request.
The ffmpeg requirement is a blocker here and although you could remove it as a "Requires:" it would pretty much cripple it so I think RPM Fusion (or ATrpms) would be more appropriate.
A couple of things about your spec:
1. I think you're approach to sitelib is excessive. Even the python template in rpmdev-newspec just uses:
%{python_sitelib}/*
2. Additionally, you can't use "%{_libdir}" because even though this is a noarch package it will still resolve to /usr/lib64 on x86_64 systems. Instead use:
%{_prefix}/lib/mime/packages/flowblade
3. Have you actually tested the program? The default paths for the modules are not correct once installed. I had to use the following:
# Fix module path in executable
sed -i 's|modules_path = "/usr/share/pyshared/Flowblade"|modules_path = "%{python_sitelib}/Flowblade"|' %{name}
# Fix melt since it's renamed mlt-melt in RPM Fusion.
sed -i "s|melt_path = whereis('melt')|melt_path = whereis('mlt-melt')|" Flowblade/mltenv.py
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |