Bug 830040
Summary: | dhclient6 errors when using -P -N | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | H. Peter Anvin <hpa> |
Component: | dhcp | Assignee: | Jiri Popelka <jpopelka> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 16 | CC: | extras-orphan, h.peter.anvin, jpopelka |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-08 11:11:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-08 03:42:37 UTC
Specifically, in /etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-<if>: IPV6INIT=yes DHCPV6C=yes DHCPV6C_OPTIONS='-P -N -cf /etc/dhcp/dhclient6.conf' Hi, thanks for the report. The 'IP assignment' and 'prefix delegation' mechanisms serve different purposes and I'm sure they can't be safely used together. See dhclient(8): OPTIONS -6 ... The -S -T -P -N and -D arguments provide more control over aspects of the DHCPv6 processing. Note: it is not recommended to *mix* queries of different types *together* or even to share the lease file between them. -P ... This implies -6 and also *disables* the normal address query. See -N to restore it. -N ... It is used to restore normal operation *after* using -T or -P. Fair enough. That means that the bug is actually in initscripts/NetworkManager, because currently there is only support for a single dhclient run on a specific interface, and what you are saying is that each query type should run a separate instance. For the record, this is not something required by the protocol, and as such it is still a shortcoming in dhclient (I have also filed a bug report with ISC on this.) The ISP expectation seems to be that these should come in under a single DUID although with separate IAIDs. |