Bug 830349

Summary:	cannot use & in a sasl map search filter
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Nathan Kinder <nkinder>
Component:	389-ds-base	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sankar Ramalingam <sramling>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.4	CC:	jgalipea, jrusnack, mreynolds
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: Using a compound search filter (with an ampersand "&" character) for the SASL mapping, the "&" was not escaped properly. Consequence: SASL mapping fails to map the SASL identity to a DN, and SASL authentication fails. Fix: check for '&', and don't escape it. Result: mapping succeeds	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 08:17:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nathan Kinder 2012-06-08 21:43:50 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/291

I have a need to use a search filter in SASL mappings where it looks like something
{{{
(&(uid=\1)(|(objectclass=x)(objectclass=y)))
}}}
the & is being substituted like \1 as seen with tracing turned on.  I have tried escaping it as \& and \\&.  I can't find any documentation on how the substitution is handled with the filter.  Is it not possible to utilize a normal ldap search filter like this in SASL mappings?

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:17:57 UTC

This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:00:59 UTC

This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 3 Ján Rusnačko 2012-08-13 13:25:32 UTC

bug830349 in sasl/sasl-qa.sh

Comment 5 Ján Rusnačko 2012-11-01 13:25:52 UTC

IP=192.168.122.86
PORT=22222

ldapmodify -h $IP -p $PORT -D "cn=directory manager" -w Secret123 <<-EOF 
dn: cn=mymap1,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config
changetype: add
objectclass: top
objectclass: nsSaslMapping
cn: mymap1
nsSaslMapRegexString: .*
nsSaslMapBaseDNTemplate: ou=TestPeople, o=sasl.com
nsSaslMapFilterTemplate: (|(&(uid=\1)(objectclass=person))(&(uid=\1)(objectclass=inetOrgPerson)))
EOF

/usr/lib64/dirsrv/slapd-dstet/restart-slapd

[jrusnack@dstet 6.0]$ ldapsearch -LLL -h $IP -p $PORT -D "cn=directory manager" -w Secret123 -b "cn=mymap1,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config" cn
dn: cn=mymap1,cn=mapping,cn=sasl,cn=config
cn: mymap1

[jrusnack@dstet 6.0]$ echo $?
0

[jrusnack@dstet 6.0]$ rpm -qa  | grep 389-ds-base
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-2.el6.x86_64

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:17:52 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0503.html