Bug 830436
Summary: | Missing IPV6INIT setting in ifcfg-* file is interpreted as having the value of "no" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tore Anderson <tore> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 17 | CC: | danw, dcbw |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-13 19:11:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 752661 |
Description
Tore Anderson
2012-06-09 14:57:50 UTC
I sent a patch to the NM mailing list about a year ago that changes NM's interpretation of the lack of IPV6INIT settings in ifcfg files, it ought to fix this problem: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2011-August/msg00062.html Tore ifcfg-rh has to interpret the config files the same way the non-NetworkManager-based networking scripts do. (That's its entire reason for existing.) Those scripts only configure IPv6 if "IPV6INIT=yes" is present, so NM must do so as well. To the extent that this is "inconsistent with the defaults used elsewhere", that's anaconda's fault for writing the file that way, and anaconda should be fixed, as you noted in your other bug. |