Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||CVE-2012-2691 mantis: Reporters able to edit arbitrary bugnotes via SOAP API|
|Product:||[Other] Security Response||Reporter:||Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov>|
|Component:||vulnerability||Assignee:||Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:|
|Version:||unspecified||CC:||bazanluis20, extras-orphan, giallu, guillaume, sven|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-03-15 00:19:22 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:||800667, 830741|
Description Jan Lieskovsky 2012-06-11 06:18:08 EDT
From the CVE request : Roland Becker and Damien Regad (MantisBT developers) found that any user able to report issues via the SOAP interface could also modify any bugnotes (comments) created by other users. In a default/typical MantisBT installation, SOAP API is enabled and any user can sign up to report new issues. This vulnerability therefore impacts upon many public facing MantisBT installations. References:  http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=14340  http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/09/1  https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420375 Upstream patches (against the v1.2.x branch) seems to be the following two:  https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/edc8142bb8ac0ac0df1a3824d78c15f4015d959e  https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/175d973105fe9f03a37ced537b742611631067e0
Comment 1 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-06-11 06:19:33 EDT
This issue affects the versions of the mantis package, as shipped with Fedora release of 15, 16, and 17. Please schedule an update.
Comment 2 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-06-11 06:24:42 EDT
Gianluca, I am not completely sure, the version of mantis package, as shipped with Fedora EPEL 5 is affected by this issue. From the upstream patches, relevant changes are touching mc_issue_note_update() routine, while that one doesn't seem to be available yet in mantis-1.1.8 version, as shipped with Fedora EPEL 5 (there are only mc_issue_note_add(), mc_issue_note_delete(), and mc_issue_update() ones [but 'note' is missing in the last one]). But to be sure, could you please have a double-checking look at the proposed patch and situation in EPEL 5 version, and schedule a fix if necessary for EPEL 5 too (I am going to create a bug for this version too, since it's affected by the second bug 830737), so we would not miss something? Thank you, Jan.
Comment 3 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-06-11 06:27:55 EDT
Created mantis tracking bugs for this issue Affects: fedora-all [bug 830741] Affects: epel-5 [bug 830742]
Comment 4 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-06-12 03:59:14 EDT
The CVE identifier of CVE-2012-2691 has been assigned to this issue: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/11/6
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2012-11-23 02:55:50 EST
mantis-1.2.12-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2012-11-23 22:24:08 EST
mantis-1.2.12-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-11-23 22:25:12 EST
mantis-1.2.12-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Vincent Danen 2013-03-15 00:19:22 EDT
EPEL5 hasn't been touched since Dec 2010, and the package is technically orphaned. As a result I'm closing this bug as this issue is fixed in Fedora. The EPEL5 tracking bug #800667 will remain open until either mantis is dropped from EPEL or it is fixed.