Bug 831251

Summary: junit4 doesn't build/no longer exists - required by maven-surefire-provider-junit4
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: relengAssignee: Daniel Mach <dmach>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: jstodola, rvokal, sochotni
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-16 11:47:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bill Nottingham 2012-06-12 14:57:42 UTC
Description of problem:

junit4 currently has a broken build dependency on java-1.6.0-openjdk.
junit4 no longer exists in Fedora.

It looks like the choices are either:

1) fix junit4, keep it in RHEL, rebuild it
2) Drop maven-surefire-provider-junit4 and the build dep in pmd

Other ideas welcome. Please fix this as soon as possible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

latest RHEL 7 nightly

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2012-06-12 16:40:18 UTC
Please do not assign these RHEL 7 bugs to me. They should go to Stano and his team. I don't know what handles the default assignee now bugzilla of pkgwrangler but whatever it is it needs to be fixed to represent the current state of affairs.

Comment 2 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-06-12 16:51:24 UTC
The issue is that junit now provides junit4. I will be fixed by updating to new version of junit and then dropping junit4. I'll do it later on

Comment 3 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2012-06-20 12:30:15 UTC
OK, so right now it boils down to: block junit4 in repositories, remove rhel-7 branch. junit now provides junit4

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2012-06-20 16:10:34 UTC
Moving to releng to take care of the request in comment #3.