Bug 83267

Summary: leaked error message on upgrade
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: R P Herrold <herrold>
Component: ttfonts-jaAssignee: Nakai <ynakai>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Bill Huang <bhuang>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: phoebeCC: eng-i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-13 10:36:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 79578    

Description R P Herrold 2003-02-01 04:54:46 UTC
This file not present error in the post install script is leaking an error
message -- a better fix would be to test for the existence of this (seemingly
old) file, before using it.


ttfonts-ja 100 % done
/usr/share/fonts/ja/TrueType /
sh: line 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/microsoft-win3.1.enc: No such
file or directory
/


This bug similar to, but different from  83192

Comment 1 Nakai 2003-02-05 08:47:52 UTC
There is microsoft-win3.1.enc file in phoebe beta4, and
ttfonts-ja don't use that file directly.

$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/microsoft-win3.1.enc
XFree86-base-fonts-4.2.99.3-20030115.0
$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir
XFree86-font-utils-4.2.99.3-20030115.0

I don't think this warning might happen on an usual environment.
Could you describe the detail set of yours? X, Red Hat Linux versions, etc..



Comment 2 R P Herrold 2003-02-05 15:30:59 UTC
stock RHL 8.0 with updates, going to Phoebe II

Comment 3 Leon Ho 2003-02-07 05:04:44 UTC
Here is what i got in when installing rawhide ttfonts-ja in Phoebe: 
 
Preparing...                
########################################### 
[100%] 
   1:ttfonts-ja             
########################################### 
[100%] 
[root@reflex BUILD]# 
 

Comment 4 Matt Wilson 2003-02-12 04:27:37 UTC
this should be fine now - can someone else verify?


Comment 5 Nakai 2003-02-13 10:36:41 UTC
Fixed in the latest ttfonts-ja now