Bug 832769

Summary: [rhevm-webadmin] - Browsing between fields using TAB looses focus at the last field
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: David Botzer <dbotzer>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portalAssignee: Einav Cohen <ecohen>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.1.0CC: acathrow, dyasny, ecohen, iheim, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, ykaul
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: ux
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-10 15:56:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Tab-2-nowhere none

Description David Botzer 2012-06-17 09:45:26 UTC
Created attachment 592401 [details]
Tab-2-nowhere

Description of problem:
When I create some entity - e.x - DC, I go between fields using TAB,
name, desc, type, ver etc... the last field, sends me to no-where
and I cannt shift+tab to go back - I can see at the bottom left of my browser
"javascript:;"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Rhevm 3.1, si6

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create new DC
2.Go between fields using TAB until last

Actual results:
Focus is gone and cannot get back using tab or shit+tab

Expected results:
tab or shit+tab should work

Additional info:

Comment 1 Juan Hernández 2012-08-31 11:28:37 UTC
Apparently this is a known issue with GWT:

http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2732

Will continue investigating it.

Comment 2 Einav Cohen 2012-10-18 23:42:06 UTC
after discussing with Gilad: Too complicated for 3.1. pushing to rhevm_future.

Comment 3 Einav Cohen 2013-05-10 15:56:32 UTC
closing as duplicate of bug 835870, which already documents this issue (among other "TAB"-key related problematic behavior).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 835870 ***

Comment 4 Einav Cohen 2013-05-10 17:45:31 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 903558 ***