Bug 834062 (CVE-2011-5095)
Summary: | CVE-2011-5095 openssl: weak public value accepted during Diffie Hellman key exchange | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Vincent Danen <vdanen> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | knoha, tmraz |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-22 15:13:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 834066 |
Description
Vincent Danen
2012-06-20 18:12:16 UTC
Note that this bug is fixed in the openssl package since 0.9.8e-20.el5 version. It is not fixed in the compat openssl098e package in RHEL-6 as it was not a serious problem. See bug 698175. Tomas, thanks for that. That means for RHEL5 this was addressed via http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1010.html. We'll defer this for RHEL6's openssl098e package. Does this also mean that openssl097a is not affected? Actually openssl097a is affected - the dh key check is not there at all. (In reply to comment #4) > Actually openssl097a is affected - the dh key check is not there at all. It seems DH_check_pub_key was introduced in 0.9.8a: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14375 As noted above, this is fixed in current Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6 openssl packages. There is no plan to add the fix to older Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions already in the Extended Life Phase, or in the compat packages. This is not handled as a security flaw, as as indicated in the above comments and in bug 698175, this may cause SSL/TLS client or server to accept weak DH public value during the DH key exchange, but it's not sufficient by itself to conduct MITM attack. Statement: This issue was addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 openssl packages via RHBA-2011:1010, bug 698175. It did not affect openssl packages shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. |