Bug 835640

Summary:	[RFE] [Web UI] Add remote_attributes relationship
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Dmitri Pal <dpal>
Component:	ipa	Assignee:	Martin Kosek <mkosek>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.0	CC:	jgalipea, mkosek
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-01-16 14:55:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dmitri Pal 2012-06-26 17:05:17 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2812

Ticket #2316 implemented a new membership type for LDAPObjects - `remote_attributes` which describe uni-directional membership in remote objects, i.e. the membership is not stored in targeted object.

IPA can now display these remote members when `--all` option is passed. For example `host` plugin can now hosts and services managed by given host.

This new membership could be displayed in a host page of our Web UI.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:21:04 UTC

This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:29:14 UTC

This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 5 Martin Kosek 2015-01-16 14:55:16 UTC

Searching and listing services managed by a host is tracked in Bug 786193. For other proposals and ideas, please file a separate RFE so that we can get a clearly specified scope of the request.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 786193 ***