Bug 836196

Summary: 3.0 - VDSM should require libvirt that fixes BZ#832184 - "Disable keepalive in libvirt by default"
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Barak <bazulay>
Component: vdsmAssignee: Igor Lvovsky <ilvovsky>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.3CC: abaron, acathrow, bazulay, borgan, dallan, danken, dyasny, dyuan, eblake, iheim, jdenemar, lpeer, mavital, mzhan, pm-eus, pm-rhel, rwu, sgrinber, syeghiay, veillard, ydu, ykaul
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: infra, network
Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9-113.2 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 832184
: 838924 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-21 12:31:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 832081, 832184    
Bug Blocks: 838924    

Comment 1 Barak 2012-06-28 10:18:59 UTC
The libvirt BZ was fixed for 0day of 6.3
libvirt version libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.1

Comment 3 Dan Kenigsberg 2012-06-28 12:17:47 UTC
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,1332

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2012-07-03 08:18:11 UTC
Note to QE: need to verify VDSM spec now requires libvirt >= 0.9.10-21.el6_3.1

Is that for 3.0 or 3.1?

Comment 5 Igor Lvovsky 2012-07-04 14:33:47 UTC
for 3.1

Comment 6 Igor Lvovsky 2012-07-04 14:51:17 UTC
Ooops, sorry it's should be for 3.0.z
For 3.1 we will need newer libvirt anyway.

Comment 8 Igor Lvovsky 2012-07-16 12:42:14 UTC
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,1344

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-08-21 12:31:22 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0998.html