Bug 836919
| Summary: | CPU topology parsing bug on special NUMA platform | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel> |
| Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | acathrow, dallan, dyasny, dyuan, gsun, jyang, mzhan, pm-eus, rwu |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-07-18 11:52:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 828729 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
RHEL Program Management
2012-07-02 07:43:24 UTC
pkgs: # rpm -qa|grep libvirt libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.2.x86_64 libvirt-devel-0.9.10-21.el6_3.2.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.9.10-21.el6_3.2.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.9.10-21.el6_3.2.x86_64 # cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep "model name"|tail -1 model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 steps: # cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep processor |wc -l 48 # cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep "cpu cores"|tail -1 cpu cores : 12 # virsh nodeinfo CPU model: x86_64 CPU(s): 48 CPU frequency: 2100 MHz CPU socket(s): 4 Core(s) per socket: 12 Thread(s) per core: 1 NUMA cell(s): 1 Memory size: 529263760 kB The cpu cores from cpuinfo is 12, the nodeifo output is also 12. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1095.html |