Bug 837450

Summary: Review Request: android-java - Google Android Java Library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: gil cattaneo <puntogil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: c.david86, mizdebsk, package-review, samuel-rhbugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:46:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 837446, 894926, 958533    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 771480    

Description gil cattaneo 2012-07-03 23:06:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.0.1.2-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: A library jar that provides APIs for Applications
written for the Google Android Platform.
Fedora Account System Username: gil

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2012-10-03 11:19:54 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm

- update to 4.1.1.4

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2013-04-28 11:39:36 UTC
What's the current status?

Comment 3 gil cattaneo 2013-04-28 15:42:16 UTC
sorry i dont understand your question
regards

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2013-04-28 16:19:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> sorry i dont understand your question
> regards

I mean has someone reviewed your ticket?

Comment 5 gil cattaneo 2013-04-28 16:56:50 UTC
no, until now.
thanks

Comment 8 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-12 05:35:51 UTC
Package builds OK.

I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS.
Where did you find information about licensing?

rpmlint:

android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Comment 9 gil cattaneo 2015-02-12 05:45:47 UTC
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8)
> Package builds OK.
> 
> I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS.
> Where did you find information about licensing?
found in the pom file
> rpmlint:
> 
> android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
should be fixed?

Comment 10 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-12 05:48:04 UTC
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> > android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> > android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
> should be fixed?

Summary can stay as-is if you rename package. I didin't check only-non-binary-in-usr-lib yet.

Comment 12 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-12-14 10:41:05 UTC
jerboaa's scratch build of java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 for git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 and rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12181621

Comment 13 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:46:03 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 14 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:46:03 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.