Bug 837450

Summary: Review Request: android-java - Google Android Java Library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: gil cattaneo <puntogil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: c.david86, mizdebsk, package-review, samuel-rhbugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 837446, 894926, 958533    
Bug Blocks: 652183, 771480    

Description gil cattaneo 2012-07-03 23:06:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.0.1.2-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: A library jar that provides APIs for Applications
written for the Google Android Platform.
Fedora Account System Username: gil

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2012-10-03 11:19:54 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm

- update to 4.1.1.4

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2013-04-28 11:39:36 UTC
What's the current status?

Comment 3 gil cattaneo 2013-04-28 15:42:16 UTC
sorry i dont understand your question
regards

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2013-04-28 16:19:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> sorry i dont understand your question
> regards

I mean has someone reviewed your ticket?

Comment 5 gil cattaneo 2013-04-28 16:56:50 UTC
no, until now.
thanks

Comment 8 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-12 05:35:51 UTC
Package builds OK.

I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS.
Where did you find information about licensing?

rpmlint:

android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

Comment 9 gil cattaneo 2015-02-12 05:45:47 UTC
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8)
> Package builds OK.
> 
> I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS.
> Where did you find information about licensing?
found in the pom file
> rpmlint:
> 
> android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
should be fixed?

Comment 10 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-12 05:48:04 UTC
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> > android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> > android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android
> > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
> should be fixed?

Summary can stay as-is if you rename package. I didin't check only-non-binary-in-usr-lib yet.

Comment 12 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-12-14 10:41:05 UTC
jerboaa's scratch build of java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 for git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 and rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12181621