Bug 837450
Summary: | Review Request: android-java - Google Android Java Library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | gil cattaneo <puntogil> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | c.david86, mizdebsk, package-review, samuel-rhbugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-10 00:46:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 837446, 894926, 958533 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 201449, 771480 |
Description
gil cattaneo
2012-07-03 23:06:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc16.src.rpm - update to 4.1.1.4 What's the current status? sorry i dont understand your question regards (In reply to comment #3) > sorry i dont understand your question > regards I mean has someone reviewed your ticket? no, until now. thanks Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc18.src.rpm Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc19.src.rpm Package builds OK. I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS. Where did you find information about licensing? rpmlint: android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8) > Package builds OK. > > I would probably rename the package, "android" usually means the full OS. > Where did you find information about licensing? found in the pom file > rpmlint: > > android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android > android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. should be fixed? (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9) > > android.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android > > android.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > android.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Android > > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > should be fixed? Summary can stay as-is if you rename package. I didin't check only-non-binary-in-usr-lib yet. Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-java.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-java-4.1.1.4-2.fc20.src.rpm - renamed - introduce license macro Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9032890 jerboaa's scratch build of java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 for git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 and rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12181621 This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |