Bug 83816
Summary: | Installer mishandles LVM /usr | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Harris Landgarten <harrisl> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | phoebe | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2003-02-13 21:57:42 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 79578 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Harris Landgarten
2003-02-09 10:53:14 UTC
This works for me here... could you attach your /etc/fstab? Created attachment 89980 [details]
fstab as requested
This is because your /usr is a jfs filesystem. We don't support jfs filesystems. You do obviously support JFS in the kernel so in what way don't you support JFS? In addition, even if you don't support JFS in anaconda, a fact that I didn't see documented anywhere, you couldn't have pick a worse choice for handling an unsupported filesystem. You just decide to ignore what was in fstab and without any user notification create a new /usr. Wouldn't it have been a much better choice to stop the installation and let the user decide what to do like you do for third party rpms? It's not supported because it's not a filesystem type we allow you to create during the installation process. I'll fix this better in a future release, but for now am just sucking the jfs module onto the second stage and then it'll mount. It's still not a supported configuration, though. If an upgrade installation runs to completion, you should deliver a stable working system. There must be something you can do to abort the installation if a system partition is on a jfs volume. Even if you can't read the volume in stage one, you can certainly read fstab so long as /etc isn't jfs. Secondly, isn't a missing /usr an exception that should be noticed. I know you can do better than creating a new partion and then mounting the jfs partion on top of it making it invisable and not notifying the user that anything is wrong. |