Bug 838162
| Summary: | CVE-2012-3381 sblim-sfcb: insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH usage [epel-5] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Kurt Seifried <kseifried> |
| Component: | sblim-sfcb | Assignee: | Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el5 | CC: | pj.pandit, praveen_paladugu, srinivas_g_gowda, vcrhonek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security, SecurityTracking |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | fst_owner=pjp | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Release Note | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-29 12:19:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 838160 | ||
|
Description
Kurt Seifried
2012-07-06 21:44:22 UTC
The patch seems to be available since long -> http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/bugs/2499/#eadb Could you please have a look? Well, fixing this issue doesn't make much sense to me: 1) I wonder why sblim-sfcb is in EPEL, it's part of RHEL for longer time. Shouldn't it be removed from EPEL then? (I wasn't able to find it in Fedora packaging guidelines.) 2) low/low and it's resolved by using systemd in recent Fedora/RHEL releases. But okay, if you're interested... sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 Hello Vitezslav, (In reply to Vitezslav Crhonek from comment #2) > Well, fixing this issue doesn't make much sense to me: > > 1) I wonder why sblim-sfcb is in EPEL, it's part of RHEL for longer time. > Shouldn't it be removed from EPEL then? (I wasn't able to find it in Fedora > packaging guidelines.) Yes, if the package is available via RHEL, it makes sense to retire it from EPEL repository. -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Please do retire it from EPEL. Thank you. Package sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Hello Vitezslav, Did you have chance to file for its retirement from epel-5? Hi, thanks for reminder, done. EL5 branch has been retired. -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sblim-sfcb/ Closing this bug. |