Bug 838602
Summary: | 3.2 - VDSM [Scalability]: On scale environment refreshStoragePool fails on timeout and caused hosts to stuck into Auto-recovery treatment. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Omri Hochman <ohochman> | ||||
Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Eduardo Warszawski <ewarszaw> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Yuri Obshansky <yobshans> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | high | ||||||
Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | abaron, acathrow, amureini, bazulay, iheim, jkt, lpeer, mgoldboi, scohen, yeylon | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | TestBlocker | ||||
Target Release: | 3.2.0 | Flags: | scohen:
Triaged+
|
||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | storage | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.10.2-17.0.el6ev | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2014-03-16 14:00:25 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 882647 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Omri Hochman
2012-07-09 14:49:38 UTC
Created attachment 597096 [details]
full_logs
Adding - VDSM Logs from two different hosts which had refreshStoragePool that failed on timeout + RHEVM Logs.
[RHEVM 3.1] [vdsm-4.9.6-40.0.el6_3.x86_64] - bug still reproduce. This bug preventing us from continuing with scale storage tests - when having storage pool with more than 50 Storage Domains and attempting to activate additional storage domains, refreshStoragePool fails on timeout(3:30 minutes) and hosts are being switched to non-operational. This will probably be solved by same solution as bug 912158, pending finilization of that patch to verify. (In reply to comment #10) > This will probably be solved by same solution as bug 912158, pending > finilization of that patch to verify. Allon, if the patch indeed solved this bug then please mark it appropriately. |