Bug 838709

Summary: flickcurl version 1.22 is available , and could be compile against raptor2
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sergio Basto <sergio>
Component: flickcurlAssignee: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 17CC: rakesh.pandit
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-11 21:07:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
flickcurl.spec.patch none

Description Sergio Basto 2012-07-09 22:01:11 UTC 
Created attachment 597158 [details]
flickcurl.spec.patch

Description of problem:

from
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168262.html
"So can we get flickcurl and (lib)rawstudio ported to raptor2? I think
raptor 1 needs to be retired sooner or later."

on 
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169570.html
 raptor 1 is scheduled to be retired so we need update flickcurl in first place. 



flickcurl-1.22 builds without problem against raptor 2 . 
I send to you flickcurl.spec.patch , which I test it.
Comment 1 Rakesh Pandit 2012-07-10 18:20:47 UTC 
Right now I wouldn't be able to push update. I don't have a personal laptop/desktop. Using a friends Windows box.

Will ask around for a proven packager to push an update here. In case you already are a package maintainer and would like to push an update go ahead and do.

Ask for permissions on pkgdb and I will approve.

Regards,
Comment 2 Rakesh Pandit 2012-07-10 18:38:40 UTC 
Came to know that rawstudio, libwawstudio, darktable depend on flickcurl library. I will check what they consume and what got changed between 1.18 to 1.22.

In case you can look at it that would be great. Me being on windows box, it is difficult task for me.

Regards,
Comment 3 Rakesh Pandit 2012-07-10 18:47:26 UTC 
Pushing this for rawhide is fine. But for other release I will need to dig deep. We may need to backport patch.

In the meantime I will check whether someone can help me here, because I don't seem to have resources to dig deep.

Regards,
Comment 4 Sergio Basto 2012-07-10 18:57:32 UTC 
yes is to push just in rawhide and to recompile rawstudio with it
Comment 5 Rakesh Pandit 2012-07-10 19:12:49 UTC 
Jason L Tibbitts helped me push an update for rawhide. Do you have packager permission to rebuild dependencies, if any, tomorrow ?

If no, ping me here and I will see if I can get a helping hand for that.

Regards,
Comment 6 Sergio Basto 2012-07-11 01:19:10 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Jason L Tibbitts helped me push an update for rawhide.

Cool!

> Do you have packager
> permission to rebuild dependencies, if any, tomorrow ?
> 

no, but I will mail to devel Mailing List, in thread http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169646.html


> If no, ping me here and I will see if I can get a helping hand for that.

we may close this ticket . 

Thanks,
Comment 7 Sergio Basto 2012-07-11 21:07:03 UTC 
Gianluca Sforna wrote that rebuild rawstudio, so closing . 

Many thanks,