Bug 839292
Summary: | Teporary file is left behind with the sed option '--copy' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Mark Wu <wudxw> |
Component: | sed | Assignee: | Martin Bříza <mbriza> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | danken, mbriza, pbonzini |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 832855 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2012-07-12 10:49:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 832855 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 707622 |
Description
Mark Wu
2012-07-11 13:30:42 UTC
I just tried to reproduce this in RHEL 6.3 and there are no files left behind. Does that happen to you, Mark? Hmm, indeed it does not show up with sed-4.2.1-10.el6.x86_64 Martin, any idea how come this is different from the Fedora (/upstream) behavior? The difference from upstream is simple - the "--copy" parameter was (re)added by us, upstream doesn't have it at all. I took a quick look into the repository and I see the bug was already fixed in RHEL 6 based on #709956 report. Other distributions, however, were left with the wrong patch that was, I think, ported on rebase to sed 4.2.1 (in RHEL 5 the parameter is all right and that's the place where I took the code for my patch) but didn't apply correctly. I think I can close this report now, reports for affected distributions and versions are already opened so there is nothing else to do. Of course, if it indeed does affect you, feel free to reopen the bug. Thanks for reporting. Martin, thanks for researching the issue. Mark, thanks indeed for your report. |