Bug 841089
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-sprockets - Rack-based asset packaging system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | notting, package-review, vondruch |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | vondruch:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-08-03 10:48:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda
2012-07-18 06:40:45 UTC
I'll take it for a review. * Name of test suite archive - Although this is a minor nit, I would appreciate if you could adjust the Source1 name to %{gem_name}-%{version}-tests.tgz at least. That would be more aligned with the packaging guidelines example [1] and other Rails packages that already uses this approach. Please consider fixing this minor nit. Otherwise, the package looks good => APPROVED [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Test_suites_not_included_in_the_package Yes, I will do that. Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-sprockets Short Description: Rack-based asset packaging system Owners: bkabrda Branches: InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). |