Bug 841645
Summary: | RHEL6 is missing "rand" man page | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Thom Carlin <tcarlin> |
Component: | openssl | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | dapospis, mvadkert |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | openssl-1.0.0-27.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Just a manpage fix - no need to document in errata text.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 10:43:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Thom Carlin
2012-07-19 17:34:26 UTC
The page is available as 'man sslrand'. Confirmed. Should the 'openssl' manpage "See Also" section be updated to reflect that? It is renamed in the spec file during the build because they were conflicting with other manpage. But that is probably not true anymore. In case of the openssl passwd manpage the conflict with regular passwd manpage still exists though. But for RHEL-6 I'd probably say that patching the See Also in the openssl manpage is the most appropriate solution. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. Man page fix setting qe_test_coverage‑. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0443.html |