Bug 842868
Summary: | Support new mod_proxy SSL interface in mod_ssl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Rob Crittenden <rcritten> |
Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-07-25 15:02:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 805720 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Rob Crittenden
2012-07-24 18:56:20 UTC
We need one bug for httpd (mod_ssl) and one bug for mod_nss - now we have two for httpd - did you mean to file this against mod_nss? I didn't see a mod_ssl component (or mod_proxy for that matter). This can be closed if the mod_ssl work will be included in the other BZ. mod_ssl/mod_proxy are all from the httpd source RPM, so yeah, that bug is fine. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 805720 *** |