Bug 843080
Summary: | Permission Denied error when executing userfiles from RHS (gluster) volume | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Marcel Hergaarden <mhergaar> | |
Component: | glusterfs | Assignee: | Amar Tumballi <amarts> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Saurabh <saujain> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 2.0 | CC: | amarts, gluster-bugs, mzywusko, ndevos, psriniva, sdharane, sgowda, ssaha, vbellur, vraman | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0qa5-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Previously, a 'Permission Denied' error would occur while executing user files on Red Hat Storage volumes. Now, the access permissions are modified to execute user files on Red Hat Storage volumes.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 843960 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-09-16 03:23:05 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 843960 |
Description
Marcel Hergaarden
2012-07-25 14:16:29 UTC
noticed that this is an issue because linux fs is handled differently for FMODE_EXEC (linux/fs.h) we don't handle that flag at all as of today... I noticed client got open flag as 0100040 and resulting converted flag was 0 (considering glusterfs.h took out O_LARGEFILE(0100000)), we didn't handle the flag in protocol convert, and hence came up with no read permissions in posix_acl_open() -Amar possible fix submitted @ http://review.gluster.com/3739 Amar, Let's plan for this fix to be pushed out in the next update i.e. update 2 for 2.0.z. patch (http://review.gluster.com/3739 - acl: enable handling of FMODE_EXEC flag) approved and applied on upstream. Kindly verify the edited doc text for technical accuracy and sign off. Doc text looks good to me Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html |