Bug 844192 (gksu-polkit)
Summary: | Review Request: gksu-polkit - Command line utility to run programs as root | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dan Mashal <dan.mashal> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alexjnewt, dan.mashal, negativo17, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | dan.mashal:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-10-28 17:14:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 468466 |
Description
Mario Blättermann
2012-07-29 20:22:03 UTC
Later this week, if I have time I can give this a review if you would like, but here's some misc comments: - You've mixed lines and spaces, which it produces a mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs rpmlint error. You should be consistent and only use spaces or tabs for white space separation (you use spaces everywhere except 3 or 4 lines have tabs) - The require on the main package for the libs sub package should be the same as the require on the devel package: "%{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" - The %post %postun macros are not necessary for the main package but rather necessary for the libs package. This should be fixed by changing the lines to: %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig - RPMLint gives a binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath error, so I would look into disabling rpath via %configure or using chrpath to fix this. - There seems to be numerous incorrect-fsf-address errors. I would suggest contacting upstream to let them know about this so they can fix it. A tip would be to make more use of RPMLint (source and binary RPMS) before posting a spec ;) Many thanks for your hints. New files: Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/gksu-polkit.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > - The %post %postun macros are not necessary for the main package but rather > necessary for the libs package. This should be fixed by changing the lines > to: > %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > > - RPMLint gives a binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath error, so I would look into > disabling rpath via %configure or using chrpath to fix this. Doing so gives me the following errors: gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 This package contains a library and its %postun doesn't call ldconfig. gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Scriptlets for the interpreter mentioned in the message should be empty. One common case where they are unintentionally not is when the specfile contains comments after the scriptlet and before the next section. Review and clean up the scriptlet contents if appropriate. Regarding the FSF address I've informed the upstream developer, CC'ed to you. Additionally, I've added gtk-doc as a install requirement to the -devel package. It adds some files to %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ but this folder is owned by gtk-doc. BTW, there are some more packages on my system which own this folder: p11-kit-devel-0.12-1.fc17.x86_64 unique-devel-1.1.6-7.fc17.x86_64 libcanberra-devel-0.28-6.fc17.x86_64 ORBit2-devel-2.14.19-3.fc17.x86_64 libgnome-devel-2.32.1-3.fc17.x86_64 thunarx-python-0.2.3-5.fc17.x86_64 gtk-doc-1.18-2.fc17.noarch polkit-docs-0.104-6.fc17.noarch mate-corba-devel-1.4.0-9.fc17.x86_64 I will file some bug reports for them. Regarding the folder ownership for the gtk-doc stuff, just found the appropriate paragraph in the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function I've reverted the changes again. Files are downloadable from the same locations. (In reply to comment #2) > Many thanks for your hints. New files: > > Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/gksu-polkit.spec > SRPM URL: > http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm > > > (In reply to comment #1) > > - The %post %postun macros are not necessary for the main package but rather > > necessary for the libs package. This should be fixed by changing the lines > > to: > > %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > > > > - RPMLint gives a binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath error, so I would look into > > disabling rpath via %configure or using chrpath to fix this. > > Doing so gives me the following errors: > > gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig > /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 > This package contains a library and its %postun doesn't call ldconfig. > > gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig > Scriptlets for the interpreter mentioned in the message should be empty. One > common case where they are unintentionally not is when the specfile contains > comments after the scriptlet and before the next section. Review and clean up > the scriptlet contents if appropriate. As the error message states, the later error is caused by the comment that is after the %postun scriptlet but before the next section, or more specifically this line: >>>%files -f %{name}.lang The former error seems to be caused by the latter error, as removing the comment fixes both errors. It would be advisable to also remove any other comments that cause rpmlint output, such as the macro-in-comment warnings from the %find_lang line, as this can cause false positive or unintentional errors (or even confusion) later on. It's also known to be "bad etiquette", though I find that a tad pedantic. > > > Regarding the FSF address I've informed the upstream developer, CC'ed to you. Got it, thanks; it will be fixed when upstream decides to do so. Looks Good though! Either tomorrow or the day after I'll attempt to give you a review. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== C/C++ ==== [x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. ==== Generic ==== [x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. [ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [ ]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine [ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required [ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5 [ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [ ]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ ]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* UNKNOWN", "LGPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE", "*No copyright* GENERATED FILE", "LGPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE" For detailed output of licensecheck see file: /home/dan/844192-gksu-polkit/licensecheck.txt [ ]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters. [ ]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST No %config files under /usr. [ ]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [ ]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 [ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [ ]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [ ]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [ ]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [ ]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [ ]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [ ]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [ ]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#EL5 Rpmlint ------- Checking: gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.src.rpm gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit.src:54: W: macro-in-comment %find_lang gksu-polkit.src:54: W: macro-in-comment %{name} gksu-polkit.src:59: W: macro-in-comment %files gksu-polkit.src:59: W: macro-in-comment %{name} gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-documentation gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gksu-polkit gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gksu-server gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-environment.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/gksu/gksu-polkit.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/main.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.h 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 17 errors, 7 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-devel gksu-polkit-debuginfo gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-environment.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/gksu/gksu-polkit.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/main.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.h 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig config(gksu-polkit-libs) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgee.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libstartup-notification-1.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(glib-2.0) pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgee.so.2()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(LIBGKSU_POLKIT)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpolkit-gobject-1.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm: config(gksu-polkit-libs) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(HIDDEN)(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(LIBGKSU_POLKIT)(64bit) gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit-libs-devel = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs-devel(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 pkgconfig(libgksu-polkit-1) = 0.0.3 gksu-polkit-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit-debuginfo = 0.0.3-2.fc17 gksu-polkit-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.0.3-2.fc17 MD5-sum check ------------- http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : eeffaa13194cf76a63c52ed3f58d5a7d MD5SUM upstream package : eeffaa13194cf76a63c52ed3f58d5a7d ========================================================================= This looks pretty good for approval however please correct the following: $ rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://live.gnome.org/gksu <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> Please open or reference a bug addressing the following: gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h Oh, looks like you beat me to it, but I would like to point out that the invalid-url warning you got is an issue on your side, not an issue with the spec. > This looks pretty good for approval however please correct the following: > > > $ rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm > gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig > /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 > gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. > Done. See the new files below. I've removed file_lang for now to avoid these > > $ rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm > gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > http://live.gnome.org/gksu <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not > known> > I didn't have any problems yet to reach this URL, should be a problem at your side (temporarily bad network connection?). > Please open or reference a bug addressing the following: > > > gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h > gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h There's no Bugzilla for it, unless I would be a Debian user and could file a bug directly from the system. Doesn't matter, I've mailed the developer directly (kov), while CC'ing Jeremy: > Hi Gustavo, > while packaging gksu-polkit for Fedora, I've detected some wrong FSF > addresses in the source files: > /common/gksu-environment.c > /common/gksu-write-queue.c > /common/gksu-write-queue.h > /gksu/gksu-polkit.c > /libgksu/gksu-process.c > /libgksu/gksu-process.h > /libgksu/gksu-process-error.h > /mechanism/gksu-controller.c > /mechanism/gksu-controller.h > /mechanism/gksu-error.h > /mechanism/gksu-server.c > /mechanism/gksu-server.h > /mechanism/main.c > I've found them by using the validation tool "rpmlint" in the v0.0.3 > files. Please consider to change the address to the current one in > future releases: > Free Software Foundation > 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor > Boston, MA 02110-1301 > USA > Best Regards > Mario New files: Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/gksu-polkit.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17.src.rpm Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== C/C++ ==== [x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [ ]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: MUST Package contains no static executables. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. ==== Generic ==== [x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: EXTRA Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. [ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [ ]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine [ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required [ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5 [ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [ ]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ ]: MUST Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required [ ]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* UNKNOWN", "LGPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE", "*No copyright* GENERATED FILE", "LGPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE" For detailed output of licensecheck see file: /home/dan/844192-gksu-polkit/licensecheck.txt [ ]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters. [ ]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST No %config files under /usr. [ ]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [ ]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 [ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [ ]: MUST Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [ ]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [ ]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [ ]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [ ]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [ ]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [ ]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [ ]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!]: MUST Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. (EPEL5) Note: Only applicable for EL-5 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#EL5 Rpmlint ------- Checking: gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17.src.rpm gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-environment.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/gksu/gksu-polkit.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/main.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/common/gksu-write-queue.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-server.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-error.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/libgksu/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.c gksu-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gksu-polkit-0.0.3/mechanism/gksu-controller.h gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-documentation gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gksu-polkit gksu-polkit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gksu-server gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint gksu-polkit-libs-devel gksu-polkit-libs gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-process.h gksu-polkit-libs-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit.h gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/librt.so.1 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0 gksu-polkit-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgksu-polkit.so.0.0.1 /lib64/libcairo.so.2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig config(gksu-polkit-libs) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgee.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libstartup-notification-1.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgee.so.2()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(LIBGKSU_POLKIT)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpolkit-gobject-1.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(glib-2.0) pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) Provides -------- gksu-polkit-debuginfo-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit-debuginfo = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm: config(gksu-polkit-libs) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 libgksu-polkit.so.0()(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(HIDDEN)(64bit) libgksu-polkit.so.0(LIBGKSU_POLKIT)(64bit) gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs-devel-0.0.3-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm: gksu-polkit-libs-devel = 0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-libs-devel(x86-64) = 0.0.3-3.fc17 pkgconfig(libgksu-polkit-1) = 0.0.3 MD5-sum check ------------- http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gksu-polkit/gksu-polkit_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : eeffaa13194cf76a63c52ed3f58d5a7d MD5SUM upstream package : eeffaa13194cf76a63c52ed3f58d5a7d ===== PACKAGE APPROVED Many thanks for your review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gksu-polkit Short Description: Command line utility to run programs as root Owners: mariobl Branches: f17 f18 Git done (by process-git-requests). np. Thanks for submitting this. Hope this solves the issue with the other bug, might need to put in a provides for the old name. gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17 gksu-polkit-0.0.3-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. Mario, What is the status of this? Looks like it's stuck in stable? testing* There were some issues with the systemd stuff. Now we have a package in F18 stable, including the new systemd macros, and it works for me. They way to get it properly packaged for f17 is somewhat different, but if someone really needs it, I could try to get it working. Please test that f18 version with MATE, if possible. Perhaps I could need a symlink from gksu to gksu-polkit to bring the old gksu behavior back. Mario, I noticed some mate package with gksu stuff in it. I wouldn't worry too much about it. There were some packages renamed in Fedora 18 (i.e. NetworkManager-gtk-devel) Would you mind if I add myself to the commit for the package(s)? Also thanks for all your help on MATE. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gksu-polkit New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: slaanesh Git done (by process-git-requests). |