Bug 845830

Summary: beta2 - Its impossible to create Non_VM non_VLAN and any VLAN Network over NIC/bond in one step
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: GenadiC <gcheresh>
Component: vdsmAssignee: Igor Lvovsky <ilvovsky>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: GenadiC <gcheresh>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.3CC: abaron, bazulay, cpelland, danken, iheim, lpeer, ykaul
Target Milestone: beta   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: network
Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9.6-29.0 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 19:04:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
vdsm log none

Description GenadiC 2012-08-05 13:16:15 UTC
Created attachment 602357 [details]
vdsm log

Description of problem:
Create NON_VM untagged Network with VM or NON_VM tagged(VLANed) Network over NIC or BOND in one step will fail with: "Setup attached more than one network to bonding bond2, some of which aren't vlans" (for bond in this example) 

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Assign NON_VM and NON_VM_VLAN Network to NIC or BOND with setupNetwork 
2. Press ok button
3.
  
Actual results:
The action will fail with "Setup attached more than one network to bonding bond2, some of which aren't vlans" (for bond in this example) 

Expected results:
The action should succeed

Additional info:
Doing it in 2 steps succeeds always

Comment 2 Dan Kenigsberg 2012-08-07 08:47:53 UTC
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/6693

Comment 4 GenadiC 2012-08-22 11:23:07 UTC
Verified in SI15

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 19:04:35 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1508.html