Bug 846983
Summary: | Incorrect cancelling of monitoring operation on M/S resource when record-pending="true" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Ales Nosek <ales.nosek> |
Component: | pacemaker | Assignee: | Andrew Beekhof <abeekhof> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | cluster-maint, jkortus |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5109 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | pacemaker-1.1.8-4.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
"Cancel" operations were incorrectly stored in the cluster status.
Consequence:
The cluster detected the stale operations and tried to clean the up, causing additional logging and confusing GUIs.
Fix:
Exclude them from being stored in the cluster status.
Result:
There are no actions matching *_cancel_* stored in the cluster status.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 09:51:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ales Nosek
2012-08-09 11:31:34 UTC
We'd need a crm_report for the time period covered by the testcase in order to be able to comment. Resolved upstream with patch: https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/197275f Will be included in 6.4 I have not observed the described behaviour with pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64. cibadmin -Q | grep cancel shows no matches. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0375.html |