Bug 849139
Summary: | Jenkins slave app should have the same quota as the app | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OKD | Reporter: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
Component: | Pod | Assignee: | Abhishek Gupta <abhgupta> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | libra bugs <libra-bugs> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2.x | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-04-04 17:26:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Johnny Liu
2012-08-17 12:02:44 UTC
This will take a couple of steps to fix. 1) Add the ability to set quota on app create (I don't think it's there currently) 2) Step 2, add this functionality through the java client 3) Step 3, use the capability from the jenkins plugin to set the same value from the source app. Note: An alternative will likely be available in the future when the slave builder is clearly called out as being a slave of jenkins. Then the broker could automatically set the same values. Abhishek, can you take a look at step 1). Based on discussion with Dan, we will implement this change after we make the change to scalable application creation to use a single gear group instead of 1 each for haproxy and the framework cartridge. Lowering the severity of this bug based on this. In bug 947580, a suggestion was made to add the configuration to specify the quota for the builder app in the jenkins plugin configuration. This would make it more flexible since the quota requirements for the builder app can often be different from the actual app. The solution proposed in bug 947580 will also address this issue. So, marking this as a duplicate of that bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 947580 *** |