Bug 849579
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-Statistics-Contingency - Calculate precision, recall, F1, accuracy, etc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mathieu Bridon <bochecha> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michael S. <misc> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bochecha, misc, notting, package-review, rc040203 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | misc:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-09-21 03:02:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 850641 | ||
|
Description
Mathieu Bridon
2012-08-20 09:03:34 UTC
Hi,
could you try to see if the signature could be checked ( cpansign -v , cf Statistics-Contingency-0.08/SIGNATURE ), and add it to the spec ?
Also, there is no license file, so you should ask upstream to include it.
And there is a unowned directory.
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: %{perl_vendorlib}/Statistics/ would be unowned
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: No description for test named CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0 (Statistics-Contingency-0.08.tar.gz)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-1.fc17.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint perl-Statistics-Contingency
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-1.fc17.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl(Params::Validate)
perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.23
perl(strict)
Provides
--------
perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-1.fc17.noarch.rpm:
perl(Statistics::Contingency) = 0.08
perl-Statistics-Contingency = 0.08-1.fc17
MD5-sum check
-------------
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/K/KW/KWILLIAMS/Statistics-Contingency-0.08.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 14a723bb0d442c5ba1790f1f27338dc2eb73e4347422ad7a9fc35c0fcb50269a
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 14a723bb0d442c5ba1790f1f27338dc2eb73e4347422ad7a9fc35c0fcb50269a
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0 (a5c4ced) last change: 2012-07-22
Command line :./try-fedora-review -b 849579
It's Fedora perl-modules' packaging convention to let perl-modules own all directories below %{perl_vendorlib}.
This packages misses to own %{perl_vendorlib}/Statistics (MUSTFIX):
# rpm -qlvp /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 3 07:25 /usr/share/doc/perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1963 Aug 24 2008 /usr/share/doc/perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08/Changes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8534 Aug 24 2008 /usr/share/doc/perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08/README
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4592 Sep 3 07:25 /usr/share/man/man3/Statistics::Contingency.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12994 Sep 3 07:25 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Statistics/Contingency.pm
Thanks for the feedback, here's a new version which should fix both issues. Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Statistics-Contingency.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Statistics-Contingency-0.08-2.fc18.src.rpm Ok, seems to be good. Approved. Thanks for the review Michael! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Statistics-Contingency Short Description: Calculate precision, recall, F1, accuracy, etc Owners: bochecha Branches: devel InitialCC: perl-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks for the SCM Jon! Package build in Rawhide, closing. Unsetting flag. |