Bug 850669

Summary: [RFE] RHS 2.0 Plus Feature Documentation: Configurable FUSE Queue Length
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Divya <divya>
Component: doc-Administration_GuideAssignee: Divya <divya>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecifiedCC: asriram, gluster-bugs, mhideo, rwheeler, sasundar, storage-doc, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-04-10 07:15:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 845214, 856206    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Divya 2012-08-22 06:37:26 UTC
In Red Hat Storage 2.0 Plus, it is planned to provide FUSE queque length as configurable option.

Comment 2 Divya 2012-09-13 09:01:39 UTC
Hi Shishir,

I am planning to add FUSE queque length information as subsection of 9.1 Native Client section. Existing documentation is available at: https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/2.0/html/Administration_Guide/chap-Administration_Guide-GlusterFS_Client.html#sect-Administration_Guide-GlusterFS_Client-GlusterFS_Client-Native

Could you please provide FUSE queque length information in Doc Text field?

Thanks,
Divya

Comment 3 Divya 2012-09-24 12:19:39 UTC
Hi Amar,

As per our meeting with Shishir today, Shishir asked me to contact you for FUSE queque length information. Could you please provide the required information in Doc Text field?

Thanks,
Divya

Comment 4 Amar Tumballi 2012-09-25 08:37:53 UTC
* <b>background-qlen=length</b>, this option makes the fuse module to handle the 'length' number of requests to be queued up before stop receiving new requests. Default is 64.

Comment 5 Amar Tumballi 2012-09-25 08:38:51 UTC
hope comment#4 is good enough.

Comment 6 Anjana Suparna Sriram 2012-09-25 08:52:12 UTC
Hi Amar,

If we need to include this feature as a section in the chapter we need more information:

1) Why is this feature available to our users?
2) How do they configure this option?
3) Are there any mandatory warnings or note that a user needs to know?

Regards,
Anjana

Comment 8 SATHEESARAN 2012-10-10 06:18:09 UTC
Moving this bug to VERIFIED state