Bug 851192

Summary:	abrt packages have a vendor tag different from all other fedora packages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Henrique Martins <fedora>
Component:	abrt	Assignee:	abrt <abrt-devel-list>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	17	CC:	abrt-devel-list, dvlasenk, iprikryl, jfilak, jmoskovc, kklic, mmilata, mtoman
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-12-20 16:02:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Henrique Martins 2012-08-23 13:16:52 UTC

Description of problem:
Not really a problem but abrt related packages have a Vendor tag of "fedora" when all other packages have a Vendor tag of "Fedora Project".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
abrt-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-addon-ccpp-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-addon-kerneloops-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-addon-python-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-addon-vmcore-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-dbus-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-desktop-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-gui-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-libs-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64
abrt-retrace-client-2.0.10-4.fc17.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always :-)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -q -i on any of the above packages.

Actual results:
Vendor : fedora

Expected results:
Vendor : Fedora Project

Additional info:
Curiously the Packager tag for all is "Fedora Package" just the Vendor is different from all the other rpms on my system

Comment 1 Jakub Filak 2012-08-24 07:40:23 UTC

Thanks for the report. We have accidently used a helper macro named 'vendor' :)

commit d8222a3719c22944e4569e013992103113bb8a52
Author: Jakub Filak <jfilak>
Date:   Fri Aug 24 09:37:02 2012 +0200

    rhbz#851192: correct Vendor tag
    
    - rename vendor helper macro to desktop-vendor

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2012-09-24 14:30:53 UTC

abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18,libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18,btparser-0.19-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18,libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18,btparser-0.19-1.fc18

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2012-09-24 20:02:59 UTC

Package abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18, libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18, btparser-0.19-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18 libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18 btparser-0.19-1.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14679/abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18,libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18,btparser-0.19-1.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2012-09-25 10:05:11 UTC

abrt-2.0.13-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.14-1.fc17,btparser-0.19-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abrt-2.0.13-1.fc17,libreport-2.0.14-1.fc17,btparser-0.19-1.fc17

Comment 5 Henrique Martins 2012-09-28 23:52:29 UTC

The FC17 versions of abrt-* seem to have hit the repos I update from today, and the Vendor strings is now in line with all other Fedora packages.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2012-12-20 16:02:37 UTC

abrt-2.0.13-1.fc18, libreport-2.0.14-1.fc18, btparser-0.19-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.