Bug 852060
Summary: | rhevm installation: Add a warning if virtio-win.vfd failed to be copied to the local nfsshare | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Simon Grinberg <sgrinber> |
Component: | ovirt-engine-setup | Assignee: | Alex Lourie <alourie> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Haim <hateya> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | acathrow, bazulay, dyasny, iheim, lnatapov, mgoldboi, mkenneth, Rhev-m-bugs, sgordon, yeylon, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.2.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | integration | ||
Fixed In Version: | si-20 | Doc Type: | Release Note |
Doc Text: |
The rhevm package now depends on the virtio-win package. This package is available in the RHEL Server Supplementary (v. 6 64-bit x86_64) channel, also referred to by the identifier rhel-x86_64-server-supplementary-6.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-24 09:49:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 852056 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Simon Grinberg
2012-08-27 13:19:40 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: On the rhevm setup section need to add the supplementary channel and a step to install the virtio. (For those who intend to use windows VMs and use the locally created NFS) On the iso-uploader section need to add the supplementary channel before the instructions for uploading the virtio-win files. simon, why don't we want to require this rpm? ship it also in rhev channel if relevant, but i don't see a use case in which it is not releavnt to rhev customers? (In reply to comment #3) > simon, why don't we want to require this rpm? ship it also in rhev channel If it's possible to have it in both channel then I don't mind. > if relevant, but i don't see a use case in which it is not relevant to rhev > customers? For customers not using Windows at all it's relevant. But I agree they are probably not the majority. Andy, how do you think about duplicating this package to the RHEV channel? (Another alternative it to enforce the supplementary channel and have rhevm require virtio-win as before) I'm for KISS and require this package from rhev-m spec perspective si24.2 partially fixed. There is an error message in the installation log file but user has no indication that something went wrong,so no reason to look in the installation log file. The error message regarding missing files/copy failure has to appear on the console while installation. This is the output from installation log file: ------------- 2012-11-18 17:33:25::DEBUG::common_utils::341::root:: stderr = 2012-11-18 17:33:25::DEBUG::common_utils::342::root:: retcode = 0 2012-11-18 17:33:25::DEBUG::nfsutils::145::root:: refreshing NFS exports 2012-11-18 17:33:25::DEBUG::setup_sequences::59::root:: running _loadFilesToIsoDomain 2012-11-18 17:33:25::ERROR::rhevm-setup::1633::root:: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/rhevm-setup", line 1630, in _loadFilesToIsoDomain utils.copyFile(filename, targetPath, basedefs.CONST_VDSM_UID, basedefs.CONST_KVM_GID) File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/common_utils.py", line 577, in copyFile shutil.copy2(fileSrc, destination) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/shutil.py", line 95, in copy2 copyfile(src, dst) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/shutil.py", line 50, in copyfile with open(src, 'rb') as fsrc: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/share/virtio-win/virtio-win.vfd' 2012-11-18 17:33:25::ERROR::rhevm-setup::1634::root:: Failed to copy files to iso domain --------------- since this requires user to cause an integrity to another required rpm, postponing the handling of this. this is not a regression - the regression was fixed by adding the dependnecy on the virtio-win rpm. |