Bug 852410
| Summary: | incorrect page count of postscript files when printed with multiple copies from the MS Office suite | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Jiri Popelka <jpopelka> | ||||
| Component: | pkpgcounter | Assignee: | Jiri Popelka <jpopelka> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | acavalla, jpopelka, twaugh | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-09-17 23:02:39 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jiri Popelka
2012-08-28 12:27:03 UTC
I need the author of the patch to explain a little what issues is the patch supposed to fix. And also attach a diff in unified format (created by 'diff -up') because I'm not sure about the last hunk. Thank you ! Created attachment 607919 [details]
diff -up output
Andrea, the diff in bug #772630, comment #8 contains two changes (postscript.py and zjstream.py) while the patch you attached in previous comment (I made it public as there's nothing private in it) contains only change of pystscript.py. Does that mean the customer actually doesn't need the following change anymore ? pkpgpdls/zjstream.py 27a28 > import pjl 35a37,39 > if ( self.firstblock.find("@PJL SET LANGUAGEHINT=ZJS") != -1 ) : > self.format = "Zenographics ZjStream (newParse)" > return self.bigEndian() Hi Jiri, I believe that person who did the "diff" just forget to send us that part. I'll check it again and send to you the diff -up output regarding zjstream.py. Hi Jiri, Customer confirmed that the changes made in zjstream.py was just a test. They did not confirm if this change bring good results or not. So, it can be ignored for now. The only change tested and needed at this moment is in postscript.py. Thanks in advance. pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18 pkpgcounter-3.50-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pkpgcounter-3.50-2.el6 Package pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-13111/pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback). pkpgcounter-3.50-2.el6 has been in testing repository, to update use: 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing pkpgcounter' pkpgcounter-3.50-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. pkpgcounter-3.50-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. FYI: patch has been merged upstream. |