Bug 852570

Summary: nlm: server reboot gives lock to second application
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Vidya Sakar <vinaraya>
Component: glusterdAssignee: Rajesh <rajesh>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Sudhir D <sdharane>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 2.0CC: gluster-bugs, rfortier, rhs-bugs, saujain, vagarwal, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 815330 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-15 07:41:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 815330    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Vidya Sakar 2012-08-29 00:53:28 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #815330 +++

Description of problem:
the issue happens withe second application gets the lock, while first application waiting for server to finish reboot and get unlock message.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.3.0qa37

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create volume 
2. start an application for putting a lock for a file.
3. after this put let the application go for a sleep
4. let the server reboot
5. now try to get a lock from some other server on same file, as mentioned in step 2.(while server rebooting)
  
Actual results:
1. the step fails, as it provides the lock to the second application.
2. the first application, the nfs log from server reboot is this,
   [2012-04-23 07:21:57.606389] I [client-handshake.c:456:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 0-dist-client-1: Server lk version = 1
[2012-04-23 07:23:47.209142] E [nlm4.c:1649:nlm4_unlock_resume] 0-nfs-NLM: nlm_get_uniq() returned NULL
[2012-04-23 07:23:47.209233] E [nlm4.c:1661:nlm4_unlock_resume] 0-nfs-NLM: unable to unlock_fd_resume
/export/dist^C



Expected results:
 1. the first application should get the unlock message.
 2. the second application should wait till the unlock does not happen for first application.

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from saujain on 2012-04-23 08:00:36 EDT ---

sosreport are placed at this place 10.16.156.3:/opt/qa/sosreport/bug815330

10.16.156.3:/opt is nfs(kernel) mountable
Comment 4 Rajesh 2013-04-15 07:41:20 UTC 
this happens only if the two systems give the same "caller name" in the lock request to the server. E.g, Mostly, the RHS/RHEL systems give the caller name as `hostname` or "localhost.localdomain". In the latter case, this behaviour is observed, while in a properly configured environment wherein clients send their proper hostnames as caller_name, this works fine.
If in doubt, one can always put this line: 

diff --git a/xlators/nfs/server/src/nlm4.c b/xlators/nfs/server/src/nlm4.c
index 595738b..ee1ae80 100644
--- a/xlators/nfs/server/src/nlm4.c
+++ b/xlators/nfs/server/src/nlm4.c
@@ -1438,6 +1438,7 @@ nlm4svc_lock_common (rpcsvc_request_t *req, int mon)
         nlm4_volume_started_check (nfs3, vol, ret, rpcerr);
 
         ret = nlm_add_nlmclnt (cs->args.nlm4_lockargs.alock.caller_name);
+        gf_log ("debuggy", GF_LOG_CRITICAL, "lock requestor: %s", cs->args.nlm4_lockargs.alock.caller_name);
 
         ret = nfs3_fh_resolve_and_resume (cs, &fh,
                                           NULL, nlm4_lock_resume);

and confirm the behaviour(and the caller names sent by the clients).