Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionJan Pokorný [poki]
2012-08-30 15:34:07 UTC
PWorker(threading.Thread) from luci/lib/ricci_helpers represents
a partly separated environment from its per-request thread.
One of the side-effects is that "translator" is not present
natively as in case of the framework-managed threads.
As a consequence, a request towards ricci handled by PWorker
can, if any error/exception occur, can be silently dropped.
The symptoms are:
- unexpected behavior: looks like the action has never been initiated
by the user
- messages like these in /var/log/luci/luci.log:
16:15:45,344 ERROR [luci.lib.ricci_helpers]
No object (name: translator) has been registered for this thread
16:15:45,350 ERROR [luci.lib.ricci_helpers]
Error retrieving batch number from rhel63-64kvm-1:
No object (name: translator) has been registered for this thread
This is due to such circumstances that fulfillment of request towards
ricci (done via PWorker/private threading) will fail and the message
to be presented to the user is arranged as lazily translated string.
Apparently, this works well outside private threading (so the user
is informed correctly about the problem), but fails in private
threading environment lacking the explicitly set translator.
Based on brief investigation, there are two options to solve this:
a/ make lazily translated strings as standard strings
- easy, but non-systemic solution
b/ try to register translator object in the private threading
environment
- seems like a right way to solve it
- see [1] for further hints
Tested reproducer:
1. cluster added into luci
2. within luci, select specific cluster, then fence devices tab
3. add any fence device, using non-ascii for, e.g., name
Expected behavior in this case is that the user is visually
informed in the spirit of "this went wrong". Currently, nothing
happens from user's standpoint, previous page is just refreshed.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.turbogears/46896
Comment 2Jan Pokorný [poki]
2012-08-31 09:53:55 UTC
Correcting myself, expected behavior is that something sensible is pushed
into luci.log instead of "No object (name: translator)...".
That is to say the latter is failure to inform about the failure and we
want to see just that original one.
Comment 5Jan Pokorný [poki]
2012-08-31 13:46:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0309.html