Bug 854212
| Summary: | 3.1 useless /usr/bin/vdsm-tool should not be shipped | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Humble Chirammal <hchiramm> |
| Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | abaron, acathrow, amureini, bazulay, bsarathy, danken, iheim, ilvovsky, jboggs, lpeer, mburns, ovirt-maint, sgrinber, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | infra | ||
| Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.9.6-34.0 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 19:09:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 849193 | ||
|
Description
Humble Chirammal
2012-09-04 11:44:02 UTC
CLOSED-NOTABUG . We are not shipping this tool. How did you get it installed (and why?). >> We are not shipping this tool. How did you get it installed (and why?). >> Does below answer it ? this tool came with the RHEV-H beta ISO from RHN. [root@dhcp210-211 admin]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor release 6.3 (20120813.0.rhev31.el6_3) [root@dhcp210-211 admin]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm vdsm-reg-4.9.6-27.0.el6_3.noarch vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-27.0.el6_3.noarch vdsm-python-4.9.6-27.0.el6_3.x86_64 vdsm-4.9.6-27.0.el6_3.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.9.6-27.0.el6_3.noarch [root@dhcp210-211 admin]# rpm -ql vdsm-python /usr/bin/vdsm-tool /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/SecureXMLRPCServer.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/SecureXMLRPCServer.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/SecureXMLRPCServer.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/__init__.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/__init__.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/__init__.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/__init__.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/betterPopen/createprocess.so /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/config.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/config.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/config.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/constants.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/constants.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/constants.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/define.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/define.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/define.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/libvirtconnection.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/libvirtconnection.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/libvirtconnection.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/netinfo.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/qemuImg.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/qemuImg.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/qemuImg.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/tool/__init__.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/tool/__init__.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/tool/__init__.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/utils.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/utils.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/utils.pyo /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/vdscli.py /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/vdscli.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/vdscli.pyo [root@dhcp210-211 admin]# --Humble Danken, why do we need vdsm-tool on RHEVH? Since this bug report was entered in bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. We do not need vdsm-tool in rhev-3.1. It is there only because it has existed upstream when we've rebased. It has no code, not only no man page. If it confuses Support and customers, it can safely be removed from downstream. removing vdsm-tool patch: https://gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com/#/c/1856/ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1508.html |