Bug 85437
| Summary: | Upgrade from 8.0 to 8.0.94 doesn't remove bdflush | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Blair Zajac <blair> |
| Component: | bdflush | Assignee: | Florian La Roche <laroche> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | phoebe | CC: | katzj, mitr, msf, srevivo |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-03-03 20:35:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
What todo about this? Absorb by kernel or by anaconda or just leave this installed on the system? greetings, Florian La Roche Ok, closing this entry. bdflush should not harm your system and we normally keep such rpms installed instead of forcing a removal. Thanks for this notice, Florian La Roche |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461; YComp 5.0.0.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Description of problem: I did a series of up2date commands to manually update my 8.0 box to run 8.0.94. After the upgrade, I compared the list of RPMs on the system with the list of RPMs supplied in 8.0.94 and bdflush is not in 8.0.94. Shouldn't the up2date list have up2date remove bdflush, as it does other RPMs? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install RedHat 8.0 2. Upgrade to 8.0.94 3. Actual Results: bdflush is still on the system Expected Results: I would think that bdflush should be removed Additional info: