Bug 858154
Summary: | [RFE] Firstboot should provide an option to setup rhsm.conf for SAM | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Hui Wang <huiwang> |
Component: | Subscription Asset Manager (SAM) | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.1.0 | CC: | alikins, bkearney, jgalipea, stbenjam |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-29 12:50:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1121117 |
Description
Hui Wang
2012-09-18 07:40:21 UTC
Not sure I understand the request. If the package is installed with kickstart, the rhsm config should be pointing to the right place. If the package isn't being installed via kickstart/anaconda, then I'm not sure. Would the assumption be that the correct repos were setup in kickstart/anaconda? Concerns are: 1) installing rpms in the startup config (firstboot and/or the rhel7 stuff) is kind of unusual. 2) how do we bootstrap enough info to install the package securely. We would need at least repo url, repo ssl/ca certs, GPG key. What could we assume is installed on the system at this point? SAM repos configs? SAM repo ssl/ca certs? SAM repo entitlement certs? SAM repo gpg key? Acking 7.1 Not a base RHEL firstboot problem. We are not adding any new firstboot modules to our solution. We are moving to a new intial-setup module. Deferring to Satellite product. |