Bug 85833
Summary: | Anaconda handles missing packages poorly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Zenon Panoussis <redhatbugs> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | phoebe | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-03-11 17:33:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Zenon Panoussis
2003-03-08 20:19:34 UTC
Note: Using NFS and the graphical installer. If they're corrupted on the server and we don't find out until rpm is unpacking them, there's unfortunately not much we can do :( Well yes, there is: make sure that anaconda asks instead of just crashing. It does that already on other corrupt packages, so why not on these three too? To me, it looks like a forgotten if/then error check, nothing much more. |