Bug 858661
Summary: | impossible to remove not promoted repo: "Repository cannot be deleted since it has already been promoted." | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Garik Khachikyan <gkhachik> |
Component: | Hammer | Assignee: | Dmitri Dolguikh <dmitri> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Garik Khachikyan <gkhachik> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | achan, ddolguik, dmacpher, dmitri, mkoci, mmccune, omaciel |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Regression, Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Unpromoted repositories could not be deleted. This is the incorrect behavior. This bug fix corrects this behavior and all unpromoted repositories can be deleted.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 19:55:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Garik Khachikyan
2012-09-19 11:24:53 UTC
please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835875 I started working on this bugzilla and then saw that Dmitri has submitted a pull request with a fix, so reassigning to him. fixed in 4060945f7d2e23dededf498d28a266a7083fe5da # VERIFIED fixed. the cli scenario in comment#0 is going fine now. recreating the repo after its deletion also works. so all looks ok :) tyvm checked on: --- katello-1.1.12-12.el6cf.noarch katello-cli-1.1.8-6.el6cf.noarch pulp-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist |