Bug 860967

Summary: Printing regression: We cannot print letter size correctly
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Andreas Schneider <asn>
Component: sambaAssignee: Andreas Schneider <asn>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: azelinka, gdeschner, sbose
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: samba-3.6.8-131.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 860965 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:45:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 860965    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Andreas Schneider 2012-09-27 08:28:31 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #860965 +++

Description of problem:
We cannot print letter size correctly cause the builtin forms are in the wrong order.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.6.6

How reproducible:
Try to print a letter size.

--- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2012-09-27 04:27:15 EDT ---

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for
potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently
deployed products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in
a release.

Comment 1 Andreas Schneider 2012-09-27 10:13:12 UTC
This only applies to Samba 3.6.x. So this RHEL release.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:45:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0338.html