| Summary: | Typo Ch. 19 page 157 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | david pool <dpool> |
| Component: | rhl-cg | Assignee: | Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 8.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/custom-guide/ch-httpdconfig.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-03-31 15:30:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Thanks. It was already fixed in CVS, and I also fixed the HTML version on the website. For other bugs, please file them separately. Ok, i've been checking the html. Is there a CVS that i could be accessing? d Sometimes it takes a while for the file to be pushed live. The CVS repository I am referring to is internal. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Description of problem: In the line below, the phrase "you can use it the ..." is wrong. you could just delete the word "it" but i'd recommend being more specific with "the application" as it's unclear if you're referring to the Http Server or the Config Tool. "If you configured the Apache HTTP Server with the HTTP Configuration Tool in previous versions of Red Hat Linux and then performed an upgrade, you can use it the application to migrate the configuration file ..." dap Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhl-cg(EN)-8.0-HTML-RHI (2002-08-14T17:28-0400) How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.open manual 2.read page 3. Actual Results: i was confused Expected Results: i should have gained incredible insight into the nature of httpd Additional info: Overall this manual is cleaner than the reference guide, i've got a butt-load of corrections to write up on that one. do you recomend i report them all on one form, or file them seperately?