Bug 862776
Summary: | /usr/bin/who returns no results - /var/run/utmp missing? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John Ellson <john.ellson> |
Component: | coreutils | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 18 | CC: | kdudka, kzak, maxamillion, ovasik, p, twaugh |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-10-19 07:33:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John Ellson
2012-10-03 14:03:55 UTC
/usr/bin/who works in Fedora-18-Beta-TC1-x86_64-Live-Desktop and also in initial install from that, but then is broken after first updates. Apparently this is caused by the latest ststemd updates: systemd-193-1.fc18-x86_64 Starting from a Beta-TC1 Live image I had updated glibc and kernel to lastest, rebooted, and /usr/bin/who still worked. Then I did "yum update systemd*" which brought in: qrencode-libs-3.3.1-4.fc18.x86_64 libmicrohttpd-0.9.22-1.fc18.x86_64 systemd-193-1.fc18.x86_64 systemd-libs-193-1.fc18.x86_64 systemd-sysv-193-1.fc18.x86_64 libgudev1-193-1.fc18.x86_64 After rebooting again, /usr/bin/who had stopped working. Works again with systemd-194-1.fc18.x86_64 (from koji) but I also had to switch selinux to permissive to be able to login at all. Updated (from koji) to: selinux-policy-3.11.1-29.fc19.noarch selinux-policy-devel-3.11.1-29.fc19.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.11.1-29.fc19.noarch configured to "enforcing", rebooted and /usr/bin/who still works. Thanks for report, based on the description and comments, this was caused by some missing selinux policy and it is solved now, right? Can we close it currentrelease then? Certainly, as far as I'm concerned. Thanks |