Bug 86412
| Summary: | Approve/Reject shows up in all comment forms | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Enterprise CMS | Reporter: | Jon Orris <jorris> |
| Component: | other | Assignee: | Justin Ross <jross> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Jon Orris <jorris> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | nightly | CC: | jross |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-04-22 03:49:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jon Orris
2003-03-21 17:31:32 UTC
@28738 It's a bug, *I think*. I am confused about the approval element of the dialog. In the old CMS UI, only tasks of the CMSTask.APPROVE type got the approval element. Based on the other ticket we're discussing, 86411, I'm guessing that the purpose of the approval element is to offer to reenable the prior task, for example to throw it back to the editor for revision. (That BTW, opens up another issue: an approval task may have n required precursor tasks. Do I reenable all of them? CMS and workflow need use cases.) I agree. We need better use cases & requirements for this behavior. Given that we don't have them, and that it's late in the development cycle, I think the best solution is to make it behave as close as possible to CMS 5.2. For the next release, we should then focus on really analyzing what CMS should do & why. Fixed in perforce change 29258. |