Bug 864121

Summary:	arptables_jf.ppc64 does not exist in ppc repository
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Aleš Mareček <amarecek>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Tomas Kopecek <tkopecek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.9	CC:	atodorov
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ppc64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-01-08 07:11:14 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aleš Mareček 2012-10-08 16:01:01 UTC

Description of problem:
There is a problem with 64-bit package of arptables_jf that doesn't exist in ppc repository. The automatic testbug fails on it because arptables_jf doesn't work properly -> see the Beaker log [A]:
arptables: arptc_commit() failed: Bad address
:: [   FAIL   ] :: Rule test - adding rule with defined address length (Expected 0, got 1)
arptables: arptc_commit() failed: Bad address
:: [   FAIL   ] :: Rule test - adding rule with defined address length and mask (Expected 0, got 1)


A) http://beaker-archive.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/beaker-logs/2012/10/3111/311101/659463/8240867//TESTOUT.log



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5, RHEL-5.9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install arptbales_jf.ppc64

Actual results:
- SNIP -
No package arptbales_jf.ppc64 available.
Nothing to do

Expected results:
installed package

Additional info:
Original arptables_jf bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576429

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-10-10 15:08:49 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for
potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently
deployed products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in
a release.

Comment 5 Alexander Todorov 2012-10-29 10:04:24 UTC

# pwd
/mnt/redhat/rel-eng/RHEL5.9-Server-20121025.3/5

# find -name "arptables_jf*"
./i386/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.i386.rpm
./i386/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.i386.rpm
./ia64/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.ia64.rpm
./ia64/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.ia64.rpm
./ppc/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.ppc.rpm
./ppc/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.ppc64.rpm
./ppc/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.ppc.rpm
./ppc/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.ppc64.rpm
./s390x/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.s390x.rpm
./s390x/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.s390x.rpm
./x86_64/os/Server/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.x86_64.rpm
./x86_64/debug/arptables_jf-debuginfo-0.0.8-11.el5.x86_64.rpm
./source/SRPMS/arptables_jf-0.0.8-11.el5.src.rpm

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-08 07:11:14 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0021.html