Bug 865168 (CVE-2012-5351)
Summary: | CVE-2012-5351 axis2: vulnerable to authentication bypass and forged messages due to a Signature exclusion attack | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Vincent Danen <vdanen> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | agrimm, djorm, gholms |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-03-08 05:45:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 919325 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 755067 |
Description
Vincent Danen
2012-10-10 22:24:50 UTC
This bug's summary seems to disagree with its description about which CVE this is. Would I be correct in assuming that the latter is the correct one, or are we facing two different bugs here? (In reply to comment #1) > This bug's summary seems to disagree with its description about which CVE > this is. Would I be correct in assuming that the latter is the correct one, > or are we facing two different bugs here? Well spotted, Garrett. I have edited this bug to refer to the correct CVE ID (CVE-2012-5351). Created axis2 tracking bugs for this issue Affects: fedora-17 [bug 919325] Statement: Not Vulnerable. This issue does not affect the version of axis as shipped with JBoss Developer Studio 5 and 6, JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 5.2.2 and 6.0.0, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6, and Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.1. |