Bug 86529
| Summary: | Availabilty of a Rawhide subchannel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Elliot Peele <elliot> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | msuchy, narsis |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-01-20 19:12:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) This is definitely RHN Satellite real. Which channels are created is decision of each team (BaseOS in this instance) and rel-eng will actually create it. End the end from Satellite POV this is invalid. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.7 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20030131 Description of problem: It would be nice to have a rawhide subchannel for the current release. With moving to a release structure that may not have dot releases it would be nice to be able to update to rawhide packages that might be more experimental than those in the main tree. This would be a good feature to at least offer to paying costumers so that they can see what is coming down the pipe in the future without having to download packages and resolve dependecies themselves from a rawhide mirror. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Why does bugzilla make me enter a steps to reproduce when this is an RFE it just seems kinda stupid to me. 2. 3. Additional info: