Bug 86536

Summary: Reverse Slave Zone Config
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Cesar Augusto M. Gomes <cesargomes>
Component: system-config-bindAssignee: Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1CC: jaap.bril
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-03 19:30:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Cesar Augusto M. Gomes 2003-03-25 11:44:28 UTC 
I need to create a Reverse Slave Zone in my Secondary DNS and I can't do this 
with bindconf. So, I edit the named.conf and add the entries of reverse slave 
zones manually using the following format:
 
Example:
zone "28.12.202.in-addr" {
        type slave;
        file "28.12.202.in-addr.zone";
        masters {
            xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;
        };
};
 
This is working fine, but I will not use Bindconf to don't lose my 
configuration.
I have tried to use Bindconf with the option Slave Zone and the domain 
28.12.202.in-addr, but this don't work.
But, I like to use the Binconf. So, my question and sugestion is:
 
- Why the RH developers don't do a Reverse Slave Zone option in Bindconf?
Comment 1 Jaap Bril 2003-12-31 15:25:58 UTC 
to be able to keep useing bindconf put the reverse slave zone in
named.custom instead.

btw I support the question.
Comment 2 Jason Vas Dias 2005-06-03 19:30:29 UTC 
This problem is fixed with system-config-bind-4.0.0-16 (FC-3/4/RHEL-4),
also available at: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/system-config-bind
and with redhat-config-bind-4.0.0-16 (RHEL-3), available from 
http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/redhat-config-bind.