Bug 866396
Summary: | sssd autofs interface library packaging change | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
Component: | autofs | Assignee: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Rock Lee <xinli> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.4 | CC: | ikent, kzhang, xinli, yanwang |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | autofs-5.0.5-62.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 10:53:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ian Kent
2012-10-15 09:31:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > > The latest RHEL-6 sssd version has the package that includes the autofs > interface library. > > Cosequently autofs needs to update it's BuildRequires. Umm ... that description doesn't make much sense. The autofs sss interface library was present in the sssd package and autofs used a specific version of sssd in it's BuildRequires. But the library was also present in its own sss package, libsss_autofs. Now the library in sssd has been removed which requires the BuildRequires in the autofs package change to libsss_autofs instead of sssd. Since the library was always present in this package changing the BuildRequires should be backward compatible with earlier RHEL-6 releases. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0462.html |