Bug 866396

Summary: sssd autofs interface library packaging change
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ian Kent <ikent>
Component: autofsAssignee: Ian Kent <ikent>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Rock Lee <xinli>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: ikent, kzhang, xinli, yanwang
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: autofs-5.0.5-62.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:53:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Ian Kent 2012-10-15 09:31:45 UTC
Description of problem:

The latest RHEL-6 sssd version has the package that includes the autofs
interface library.

Cosequently autofs needs to update it's BuildRequires.

Comment 2 Ian Kent 2012-10-15 09:48:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> The latest RHEL-6 sssd version has the package that includes the autofs
> interface library.
> 
> Cosequently autofs needs to update it's BuildRequires.

Umm ... that description doesn't make much sense.

The autofs sss interface library was present in the sssd package
and autofs used a specific version of sssd in it's BuildRequires.
But the library was also present in its own sss package,
libsss_autofs.

Now the library in sssd has been removed which requires the
BuildRequires in the autofs package change to libsss_autofs
instead of sssd.

Since the library was always present in this package changing
the BuildRequires should be backward compatible with earlier
RHEL-6 releases.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:53:47 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0462.html