Bug 867074

Summary: ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0 B')
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Jesse Keating <jkeating>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Chris Lumens <clumens>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: dcantrell, jstodola
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1fad293eff01a7e66ed77310ec510ddd519e39fe3a6bed46f615a88d44ed5eee
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-09 16:53:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: anaconda-tb
none
File: product
none
File: type
none
File: storage.log
none
File: version
none
File: environ
none
File: anaconda.log
none
File: syslog
none
File: hashmarkername
none
File: packaging.log
none
File: cmdline_file
none
File: release
none
File: program.log none

Description Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:23 UTC
Description of problem:
Installation on s390x.  Selected 14 DASD devices and clicked continue.

Version-Release number of selected component:
anaconda-18.16

Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.16
cmdline:        /usr/bin/python  /sbin/anaconda
kernel:         3.6.0-0.28.el7.s390x

description:
:The following was filed automatically by anaconda:
:anaconda 18.16 exception report
:Traceback (most recent call first):
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/storage/size.py", line 99, in _parseSpec
:    raise ValueError("invalid size specification", spec)
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/storage/size.py", line 137, in __new__
:    self = Decimal.__new__(cls, value=_parseSpec(spec))
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/storage.py", line 116, in size_str
:    return str(Size(spec=spec)).upper()
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/storage.py", line 156, in _set_free_space_labels
:    disk_free_text = size_str(disk_free)
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/storage.py", line 236, in refresh
:    self._set_free_space_labels(disks_size, disk_free, fs_free)
:  File "/tmp/updates/pyanaconda/ui/gui/spokes/storage.py", line 654, in on_continue_clicked
:    dialog.refresh(required_space, disks_size, disk_free, fs_free, self.autopart)
:ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0 B')

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:26 UTC
Created attachment 628294 [details]
File: anaconda-tb

Comment 2 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:27 UTC
Created attachment 628295 [details]
File: product

Comment 3 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:28 UTC
Created attachment 628296 [details]
File: type

Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:30 UTC
Created attachment 628297 [details]
File: storage.log

Comment 5 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:32 UTC
Created attachment 628298 [details]
File: version

Comment 6 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:33 UTC
Created attachment 628299 [details]
File: environ

Comment 7 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:37 UTC
Created attachment 628300 [details]
File: anaconda.log

Comment 8 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:39 UTC
Created attachment 628301 [details]
File: syslog

Comment 9 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:40 UTC
Created attachment 628302 [details]
File: hashmarkername

Comment 10 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:41 UTC
Created attachment 628303 [details]
File: packaging.log

Comment 11 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:43 UTC
Created attachment 628304 [details]
File: cmdline_file

Comment 12 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:44 UTC
Created attachment 628305 [details]
File: release

Comment 13 Jesse Keating 2012-10-16 17:18:46 UTC
Created attachment 628306 [details]
File: program.log

Comment 14 Chris Lumens 2012-10-16 18:00:39 UTC
Does updates=http://clumens.fedorapeople.org/size.img fix this?

Comment 15 Adam Williamson 2012-11-05 20:04:12 UTC
As far as Fedora goes, dlehman believes these '0 b' issues have been fixed for some time now. not sure how that translates to RHEL.

Comment 18 Jan Stodola 2013-12-09 16:53:23 UTC
I haven't seen this issue for a very long time, so I'm closing this bug. If you see it again, please, re-open.

Comment 19 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:38:03 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days