Bug 868972
Summary: | CPU topology is missing in capabilities XML when libvirt fails to detect host CPU model | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Chris Pelland <cpelland> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Jiri Denemark <jdenemar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | acathrow, asegundo, dallan, danken, dougsland, dyasny, dyuan, honzhang, jdenemar, mzhan, pm-eus, rvaknin, rwu, ybronhei, yupzhang |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | TestBlocker, ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause: When libvirt could not find a suitable CPU model for host CPU, it would not provide CPU topology in host capabilities even though the topology was detected correctly.
Consequence: Applications that want to examine host CPU topology but otherwise do not care about CPU model could not see the topology in host capabilities.
Fix: Host capabilities XML now contains host CPU topology even if host CPU model is unknown.
Result: Applications can rely on host CPU topology to always be present in capabilities XML unless detecting the topology itself failed.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-11-22 09:40:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 866999, 876475 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Chris Pelland
2012-10-22 15:27:07 UTC
Sent for review: http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhvirt-patches/2012-October/msg01258.html Verified on libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64 (rhel6.3). The VM's xml given by "virsh capabilities" now contains the cpu topology: <capabilities> <host> <uuid>067f8a8b-5ab3-413c-aa37-945854bf102e</uuid> <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <topology sockets='1' cores='1' threads='1'/> </cpu> <power_management> <suspend_disk/> </power_management> <migration_features> <live/> <uri_transports> <uri_transport>tcp</uri_transport> </uri_transports> </migration_features> <topology> <cells num='1'> <cell id='0'> <cpus num='1'> <cpu id='0'/> </cpus> </cell> </cells> </topology> <secmodel> <model>selinux</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> </host> </capabilities> Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1484.html |