Bug 869912

Summary: WEBADMIN: Bond with *one* interface in it.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: awinter <awinter>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portalAssignee: lpeer <lpeer>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: yeylon <yeylon>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 3.1.0CC: acathrow, ecohen, iheim, jkt, lpeer, mavital, Rhev-m-bugs, srevivo, yeylon
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: network
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-12 12:19:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Network RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Removing eth2 creates an empty bond
none
Displaying Caps for the bond none

Description awinter 2012-10-25 06:39:21 UTC
Description of problem:

After following these steps, a bond with only one interface is created.

Steps to Reproduce:

[ On a working environment:
     DataCenter, Cluster, Host with 4 nics]

1         Create Bond0 (any mode) of eth2 and eth3
2         Create sw1 (as Required) and link it to the cluster
3         Link sw1 to the host (on bond0)
4         ifdown eth2 (on the host)
5         Wait 70 seconds         =>         Verify that the host is OK
6         ifdown eth3 (on the host)
7         Wait 70 seconds         =>         Verify that the host is DOWN
8         ifup eth2 (on the host)
9         Activate host
10        Wait 70 seconds         =>         Verify that the host is UP
  
Actual results:

The result of these steps is a bond with only one interface (eth2)

Expected results:

The result should be a bridge with eth2 & eth3 when eth2 is "up" and eth3 is "down"

Additional info:

Comment 2 awinter 2012-10-25 08:51:18 UTC
Created attachment 633229 [details]
Removing eth2 creates an empty bond

Comment 3 awinter 2012-10-25 08:52:25 UTC
Created attachment 633231 [details]
Displaying Caps for the bond

Comment 8 lpeer 2014-01-12 12:19:41 UTC
This flow is low priority, due to capacity limitations closing this.